Section of the journal:
Social and political philosophy
Pages:
134-145
Bibliographic description of the article
Kostarev, S. V. ENGAGEMENT STAKEHOLDERS IN THE LIFE SPACE DEVELOPMENT / S. V. Kostarev. – Text : direct //
Innovative Economics and Society. – 2024. – № 2 (44). – С. 134-145
Abstract
An essential basis for making decisions on the development of territories where people live is currently the needs of residents and their interests, which must be taken into account at the all stages of projects, while maintaining environment sustainability. To solve such problems, the article proposes a methodology and demonstrate a technology for engagement stakeholders in the process of development of social organisms, including individuals, social groups and the environment. The main objective of such engagement is considered to be the creation of a communication space that can serve as the basis for a continuous process of co-creation in order to ensure the coherent coexistence of people, communities and the environment. To substantiate the proposed solutions, both positive practice and negative experience obtained by the author in a number of local urban projects are used. In modern foreign studies, dozens of specific techniques and technologies of involvement have been summarized, their classification has been carried out, their specificity and scope of application have been described, however, the peculiarity of social methods of engagement is that they depend on the cultural and historical context and are defined in accordance with the existing semantic sets of names of a particular or other human activities. In this connection, the article offers the author’s interpretation of the concepts used in foreign studies, based on similar activities in Russian reality. In some cases, the author replaces the direct translation with a semantic analogue, based on established practice, which should reduce barriers to the implementation of the proposed method. However, the options for interpreting the names and content of activities proposed by the author are currently debatable and may change in the course of future research.
References
Saad, Sameh and Al Afifi, Maan. The ABCD Validation Management Tool for business excellence models / WSEAS Transaction on Business and Economics, 2015, Vol. 12, pp. 363-376.
Bidhan L. Parmar, R. Edward Freeman, Jeffrey S. Harrison, Andrew C. Wicks, Lauren Purnell and Simone de Colle. Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art / Academy of Management Annals, 2011. Vol. 4, No. 1. Available at: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/19416520. 2010.495581 (accessed 11.03.2024).
Kostarev, S. Social project stakeholders: definition and analysis / Innovative economy and society, 2016, vol. 3, pp. 85-91 (in Russian).
Sherry R. Arnstein. A Ladder of Citizen Participation / Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 1969, 35:4, pp. 216-224
IAP2 Spectrum of Public Participation. Available at: https://iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2018_IAP2_Spectrum.pdf (accessed 11.03.2024).
Galvagno, M. and Dalli, D. Theory of value co-creation: a systematic literature review / Managing Service Quality: An International Journal, 2014, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 643-683.
Leino Н., Puumala Е. What can co-creation do for the citizens? Applying co-creation for the promotion of participation in cities EPC / Politics and Space, 2021, Vol. 39(4), рр. 781–799.
Geekiyanage, D., Fernando, T., Keraminiyage, K. Mapping Participatory Methods in the Urban Development Process: A Systematic Review and Case-Based Evidence Analysis / Sustainability, 2021, 13, 8992. Available at: https://www.mdpi.com/2071-1050/13/16/8992 (accessed 11.03.2024).
Geekiyanage, D., Fernando, T., Keraminiyage, K. Assessing the state of the art in community engagement for participatory decision-making in disaster risk-sensitive urban development / International Journal oof Disaster Risk Reduction, 2020, 51, 101847. Available at: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2212420920313492 (accessed 11.03.2024).
Marquand, J., Kostarev, S. Sustainable development in Omsk – lessons for Central Europe. Economic and Environmental Studies, 2020, 13, 153-166. Available at: https://czasopisma.uni.opole.pl/index.php/ees/article/view/3147 (accessed 11.03.2024).
Kostarev, S. Urban politics: basis and Omsk practices of public space development / Development of political institutions and processes: foreign and national experience, 2020, pp. 344-352 (in Russian).
City decided. Available at: https://городрешает.рф (accessed 11.03.2024).
Kostarev, S. Flexible learning methodology for sustainable development / Sustainable development: priorities in the field of education (experience of Russian regions), 2022, pp. 143-161 (in Russian).
Davies, R., Dart, J. The “Most significant change” (MSC) technique. Research, January 2005. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication /275409002_The_ ”Most_Significant _Change”_MSC_Technique_A_Guide_to_Its_Use (accessed 11.03.2024).
Mitin, I. Mental city maps / Urban studies and practices, 2018, vol. 2 (3), pp. 64-79 (in Russian).
General plan of Omsk, 2021. – 280 с. (in Russian)
Bozic, V. Methodology of system dynamics. Research proposal, March 2023. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/369466672_Methodology_of_system_dynamics (accessed 11.03.2024).
10 Steps to a Successful Design Charrette: A Practical Guide. Available at: https://blog.daisie.com/10-steps-to-a-successful-design-charrette-a-practical-guide/ (accessed 26.02.2024).
Kostarev, S. Future vision as the adaptive development basis // Human in an Unstable World, 2017, pp. 41-47 (in Russian).
Ministry of Finance of the Omsk Region. Initiative budgeting. Available at: https://omskportal.ru/oiv/mf/etc/Инициативное-бюджетирование (accessed 11.03.2024).
Asset-based community development. Available at: https://www.nurturedevelopment .org/asset-based-community-development/ (accessed 11.03.2024).
Saad, Sameh and Al Afifi, Maan. The ABCD Validation Management Tool for business excellence models / WSEAS Transaction on Business and Economics, 2015, Vol. 12, pp. 363-376.